NIAZ MUHAMMAD versus KASHMIR KHAN
Sections 12 and 42 of the specific performance of the contract of sale by two different plaintiffs against the same seller and the specific performance of the contract, filed by party 2 10 1981, with suit for claiming respect for the same land. The suit was ordered on the basis of 14 2 1981, by a lawyer for Seller Party B, admitting the written statement claiming to be the owner in 28 2 1980, which was finally ruled by the Appellate Court on 24 1 1982. That it is fully sold. This was not mentioned in the claim filed in 1981 dated 1981, which was to be premature, a proof of the fact that the sale in favor of Party B had already taken place before Party A appeared. ? Scene
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Jehangira lawyer
