AYAZ AMIR versus RETURNING OFFICER FOR NA-60, CHAKWAL
Sections 14 (5) and 99 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 and 63 Papers Nomination Papers Nominated Candidate (a journalist) Disagreement of Profit column in the newspaper by candidate, a candidate (Interpreter) Interpretation Returning Officer The applicant's papers Rejected nomination On the basis that he published in one of his columns in the newspaper, it can be assumed that he had tasted alcohol and violated the integration of Islam. Writings cannot be briefly described in the literary, metaphorical and imaginative style of the applicant / candidate. It was not so, yet one cannot ignore the fact that individual words have multiple dictionary meanings and, therefore, was open to interpretation, no concrete evidence was brought to the record nor to them. The appellant was convicted of an offense for the offense. Under the Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution, the court of any competent jurisdiction to submit a disqualified appellant under the nomination scrutiny was summarized and cannot be investigated for investigation if the appellant. If they have violated the integration of Islam or demanded a Returning Officer in Pakistan ideologically, they rejected the nomination of the appellant and directed them to be named in the election tribunal. The list of nominated candidates contesting from the constituency and the decree passed by the Returning Officer were approved accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
