MUHAMMAD AZHAR versus MEMBER JUDICIAL-VII, BOARD OF REVENUE
AR (Constitution of Pakistan) (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Appointment of Lumbar / Headman Points to be considered as Applicant which was appointed by the District Officer (Revenue) as Lombardar, however, on the respondent's appeal before the Revenue classification. That the appointment was canceled and that the defendant was appointed as the limber / headman that the applicant believed that he was a better choice than the respondents. In addition to the inherent claim of a candidate, the extent of the property in the State, the services rendered by them. For the appointment of the Lambard Educational Family, the family had the personal influence, the role, the ability and the freedom from obligation, the strength and importance of the community from which the headman was to be selected, and the ability to train in civil defense. ? There was also sufficient consideration of the capacity and conduct of the land to meet the requirements of India. To meet the requirements of the said office, no one had the right to be appointed as a lambardar for the appointment of a headman. , And if the tax authorities have made a person suitable for this purpose, they should facilitate it. The performance of the administrative duties entrusted to the headman, in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, cannot be disturbed. The High Court observed that after the relevant taxation authorities had taken into account the relevant facts and the law. Decision was made, and in the absence of any such jurisdiction, wrongdoing or wrongdoing by such authorities, contaminated orders could not be interfered with. Constitutional application was dismissed,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
