Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Fake Transfer Suit of Current Results of Facts, False Reading and Not Reading Evidence The plaintiff claimed that the suit property transfer in the name of the accused was the result of fraud. Is. The lawsuit and appeal filed by the defendants together with the claim that both courts ignored the documentary evidence that relied on the oral testimony of the witnesses. The plaintiff failed to prove the sale in favor of them, and they also had a controversial transfer method. The defendants were also required to consider the transfer of property in their favor, because a defendant sued the property owner. Became a lawyer and sold the property in favor of the second defendant, who in turn gifted the suit property to the owner's lawyer, was sufficient to prove such transfer fraud by the court decision and the courts below. The decisions issued were the result of not only misreading one, not reading the evidence but also documenting the undocumented evidence. Neglect, which was part of the Income Tax Record and Ethnic Tables, was also not denied by the defendants and their witnesses, and against the documentary evidence, the results recorded by the courts below and the law on the subject were ignored. Had to In the view of the law in the use of the jurisdiction of the review, the facts below were searched simultaneously by the two courts and allowed to amend the case in favor of the plaintiffs.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
