The plaintiffs' proprietary rights and legacy of the Declaration of Succession, section 10 and 20 suits, the Government Offices of the Colonization (Punjab) Act (v. 1912), are not stated anywhere in their knowledge of the grant of proprietary rights and all further modifications. Was not recorded as a defendant. The filing time on the case was stopped by the plaintiff's owner, the plaintiff's owner, 58 years after a similar challenger's mutation in the suit did not challenge the various changes, after confirming the change in question. Under which the plaintiff allegedly acknowledged the conversion. According to the plaintiff, the plaintiff was told that after the marriage of the daughters his mother transferred the suit property under his family settlement to his name, as he denied his claim that his father had filed the High Court. Exclusively acquired all of the properties that are under review jurisdiction. Put aside the decisions and orders passed by both the courts against the evidence and against the law's profanity, consequently the case filed by the plaintiff was dismissed, revision of the circumstances was allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
