Sections 14 (5A) and 99 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 and 63 Lending Guarantees Responsible Candidates Appealing by the Returning Officer accepted by the Returning Officer, Appellant Bank preferred direct appeal before the High Court. Given that it was alleged that the defendant was deliberately indebted to the candidate. The Plaintiff presented was that he was a guarantor and neither the principal lender's decision was approved against the defendant nor was the Supreme Court upheld, but it remained unsatisfactory, the responsibility of the guarantors. The obligation was related to the principal obligation, therefore, the defendant was responsible. Respondents did not disclose the fact of passing an order against them in their nomination papers. Respondents were declared not only defaulters under Section 14 (5A) of the Public Representation Act 1976, but also guilty of concealing the facts. Was. Respondent was affected by the provisions of Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution read with Section 14 (5A) f The Election Tribunal of the Representative People Act, 1976, to remove the name of the respondent from the list of legitimate nominees in the constituency. Directed and his papers were rejected nomination accordingly the appeal was allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
