Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF KHAN versus P.I.A. INSTITUTE OF PLANETARIA ASTRONOMY AND COSMOLOGY, KARACHI AIRPORT, THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), while on duty from Section 4 Service Appellant, were arrested in a murder case and released five years later from court-authorized jurisdiction. Was released, after his release from prison, the appellant approached the authorities with his request to allow him to join his duty, but he was not allowed to do so because the appellant was arrested on duty and This fact was in the knowledge of the authorities, so no action could be taken against the appellant. The notice was issued to him, but no show cause notice was issued to the appellant and he was not allowed to join his duty merely because the appellant was allowed to join his duty after a gap of five years. Not possible but nothing was on the record. To show that in the absence of the appellant during the five years, the authorities had taken any action against him. After suspending or not suspending it under section 4 of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, he was given notice of the grievance notice on any disciplinary action taken against him, the authorities should have decided that Whether an inquiry should be made or no showcase notice was issued to the appellant and before any action was taken against the appellant, the show cause notice was required to be issued, the order not allowed was allowed and the case remanded. Was given. Authorities r \ n to take appropriate action in the matter according to the law famous high court advocate from Shemier lawyer