Find a Lawyer

AZHAR RASHEED KHAN versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN

Section 3, 5 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Superintendent of Police for three years under the charge of Assistant Superintendent of Police (BPS 17), appeals to the Demonstration Appellant. Was excluded from the post. That they disobeyed the order of transfer of the appellant from one province to another, but despite repeated instructions from the authority, the charges were not deliberately dismissed, despite repeated written instructions to the appellant. The conviction was not denied. Conduct of inquiry against the appellant was not necessary, the appellant was not given the opportunity of a personal hearing although it was almost mandatory whether or not it was provided in law, but in exceptional cases, objection to the personal hearing. Was not considered to be malicious. The accused's disobedience to the disciplinary proceedings against the public servant was proved in the face of record on the appellant's dreadful orders. And personal hearing on removal of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, and was not sought by the Appellant in any way that the account was not unfairly treated in any way, Appellant's request. He was not provided with a personal hearing, could not help him in his defense. The second show cause notice to the appellant was only made after regular inquiry under section 3 (1) (2) of the removal of this service (special powers) ordinance, 2000 the appellant was rightly prosecuted by the authorities Guilty, but in the facts and circumstances of the case, there was a large immigration advocates phone number from Sheikhupura lawyer