ZAFAR REHMAN versus MEMBER (POWER), WAPDA, LAHORE
R4 (1) (b) Appellant Appointment for Termination of Services in the Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Services, was designated against the post of survey helper whereby appellant's basketball services were terminated. They were made absent. For more than five years, the appellant claimed that since he had played some basketball matches during the alleged absence period, it cannot be said that he was absent from duty. During the alleged period of absence from duty, he played a basketball match, but only made a general statement in this regard, on this ambiguous claim by the appellant, it cannot be believed that he was playing some matches. Remained on duty. The appellant admitted that he had never served as a survey helper while he was found absent from the duties, without legal justification in the circumstances. Due to a deliberate absence of a duty of duty, the disputed judgment against the appellant was passed by the authorities, a legal and lawful order by which they were entitled to pay the appellant as their employer. Was denied, the appeal was declared a merit, it was dismissed,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Mangal Sada lawyer