Find a Lawyer

SAEED KHAN MOBEJO versus TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED

Section 2 O and Master Master and Servant, Service tribunal rules of appeal to authority aybltysn claimed that it was a private limited company that was the reason the companies Act, 1984 and the master and servant kntynsn Was governed by the principle of In the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, in section 2A, all employees of a corporation, and in sovereign entities where the government holds majority share or control, the organization shall be regarded as one of the public servants for the purpose of the affairs of its employees and the service. The tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction. Read the provisions of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 to deal with employees' matters related to Article 212 of the Constitution. The fact that the organization was a limited company under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 would not give undue authority over its employees and rules. Will govern them. The concept of such a relationship between master and servant relative has not been constitutionally enjoyed. No law enforcement or Islamic principles, including the principles of other masters and servants, which are far below human dignity, will not be retained. \ r \ n \ r \ n advocate from Chakwal lawyer