Find a Lawyer

SYED MUZAMMIL HUSSAIN versus CENTRAL DIRECTORATE OF NATIONAL SAVINGS (CDNS)

Removal of sections 3, 5, 6 and 10 from the service Appellant has been charged after issuing a job and issuing show cause notices and alleging inquiry against him that the concerned National Savings Center in-charge has carried heavy. The money is fraudulent. The appellant's appellant's assertion that he was not responsible for the questioning letters, writings and alterations made by the Central Criminal Authority to the Commission for the misappropriation of funds, which in this case did not authorize any person to be an authorized officer. That was not violated. The relevant law, the major penalty for removing appellant from employment, was irregular, in which case the inquiry in this case was answered in the form of an answer which could not be approved, it was stated that the inquiry was made. However, the appellant can be sentenced. The statements of witnesses were not obtained under pressure in this case, hardly in the eyes of the law E or the appellant of oppression was also accused by the central accused of concealing the facts related to the commission of fraud. He had failed to notify the appellant of the administration or higher authorities that he did not know about the main accused's action and that he was in his position. Subordinate, it was not possible to report the appellant's error against his boss, in the circumstances most would be termed "negligence", which would be sufficient to pay a nominal penalty for which the appellant would More than 20 years were recorded. The appellant was removed from the service, amended and served for three years with no added effect. us immigration advocates from Faisalabad lawyer