Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI KHAN versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. ISLAMABAD

The Service Tribunal, which appealed to the Section 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), was upset by the order of the authority, which denied that the appointment stated that The appointment was obtained by the appellant through fake and fabricated documents. Record to show that a regular appointment order was issued in favor of the appellant and that the appellant joined duty in complying with the order, the appellant was transferred from one place to another and upon his request He was transferred to the workplace, apart from the duties of appellant, he was selected for the inter-zone cricket championship and the order was regularly approved and his salary was set from time to time. And the selection grade was given to them under which the applicant's name was listed. In his favor, a sanitary list and a service book were also prepared by the authorities on the record show evidence from time to time for transfer of appellant and addition of selection grade, giving the applicant the unwanted order against him at least. The lesser showcase was entitled to the notice, but neither his serious appellant was given the opportunity to explain. As a legitimate employee of the Authority, since the Authority had not been formally observed in issuing the showcase notice to the appellant and providing an opportunity to defend itself, it was therefore governed by the principles of natural justice and fair play. Can be breached by not accepting service tribunal appeal, setting inappropriate order property advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer