Find a Lawyer

QARI HASSAN DIN versus DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRCUTIONS (SE) PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 7 Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Regulation of Services) Rules, 1974, R8 (1) (b) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Denial as an Oriental Teacher in Section Session Grade Appellant Entered service. BS 9, and consequently, he did BA, B Ed was denied Section Session Grade B Section 16, but the respondent, who later applied for Appellant as Section V in BS 9. Entered the service, the section was awarded the standard CT-grade 16 for the award of the section CT-T grade 16. There was a direct conflict with Section 7 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 as well as R8 (1) (b) of the Punjab Government Employees (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974 when a teacher was awarded the Section Session T Grade 16 Award. Or when I applied for The department requested applications for such a grade award, relevant teachers had to have the required qualifications that were determined as a BED, regardless of what it had achieved when the department was required to award Setco's grade. In the case of NT Touchstone should be in accordance with Section 7 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 and R8 of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974, that is, both the appellant and the defendant entered the service in BS 9 differently. On the dates whether the respondents received the BAD degree before the BED was only a minor date to keep in mind when the defendant filed a complaint. The N-CT was given a grade and had to see whether the date the appellant had the required qualifications to qualify for the acquisition of the Section Session Grade Award on the relevant date, which the appellant stated. best advocate from Narowal lawyer