Find a Lawyer

HAJI PEER BAKHSH versus UNION COUNCIL BOLHARI, BOLHARI, TALUKA KOTRI, DISTRICT DADU

RR 2 2, 2 3, 4 1, 4 4, 4 5 (2) and 4 6 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 claimed on appeal from the Civil Service Pension Benefit Service Tribunal Appellant. Pensionary benefits he had served for more than 10 years when appellant was appointed when he was only fifty years old when he was too old for initial appointment in any government service Appellant was appointed assistant on 4 4 1988. Was born and his date of birth was 1927 and the date of the appellant before his appointment was terminated before the appointment of the appellant in 1988, he himself was deprived of the circumstances and if he did not do it favorably. Or if it was a work of pure grace. And the irregular appointment, deserving of discouragement, no, the unwanted appellant did not file the appeal before the Tribunal appeal filed by the appellant was not in accordance with the terms of section 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1976. 3 Otherwise, the appellant protested against his retirement order almost four years later, which apparently seems to have been banned. patent advocate from Ukba lawyer