GHULAM MUSTAFA CHANNA versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE SINDH
Rr 3 and 4 denied service allegations and forgery, allegation of non-public employee non-disclosure before the inquiry officer, though repeated calls were made because the public servant denied the allegations in response to the notice and the final showcase notice. No, but requested that such a transaction occur with the approval of the then Deputy Deputy Commissioner, where more than one offender was involved in a misconduct, then he was responsible for the action, jointly and jointly. Will, the best course for a civil servant was to appear before the inquiry officer and his position was made clear that the investigation Absence of Jesse action will give rise to negative prejudice against public servants, in the absence of regular inquiry, allegations based on documentary evidence may prove to be invalid or invalid. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Loralai lawyer