Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMED RIAZ versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

The Section 9 Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973), the Appellant's Section 4 Promotion Intelligence Service Tribunal, claimed that he was ignored as the senior most assistant electrical inspector while his juniors were promoted. , Despite the fact that the Appellant has all the qualifications required for this position. Electric Inspector (B18) Respondents' case was that the Appellant did not meet the prescribed qualification for the post of Electric Inspector, (B18) Appellant having 3 years Diploma in Engineering as Electrical Sub Inspector. Was set on Appellant subsequently obtained a Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering in 1983, the appellant claimed that the interpretation of the B. Tech (Hons) awarded by him was equivalent to the B.E. Engineering / B.E degree. Provided that its decision has been reported by the Supreme Court as PLD 1995 Section C701 and on the basis of which it is appointed as the office of the Electric Inspector (B 18) Office Memorandum issued under the auspices of the Supreme Court. But can apply to employees of federal departments. Neither the government nor the provincial government Sindh because the recruitment rules were different for the provincial government, the Syed Office Memorandum had already been challenged before the Lahore Engineering Council on recognizing the equality of education degree related to engineering. Is under the jurisdiction of And the Lahore High Court had suspended the disclosures of the Office Memorandum of Pursuit of Record which revealed that the Government of Sindh did not do so with the equivalent of BSc Engineering / BE degree. immigration advocates phone number from Gadoon Amazai lawyer