Find a Lawyer

MUHIB ALI versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF SINDH POLICE, KARACHI

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Complaint document on the restoration of appeal excluding section 4, appellant misappropriation and government grievances Was dismissed on the charge of. Money appellant was also involved in a criminal case arising out of an FIR filed under sections tions420, 940 34 and 34, PPC, against the order dismissing his employment by the appellant. In the appeal, he was finally ordered to be restored to his service was upheld until rehabilitation The appellant was also acquitted in a criminal case under Section 249A, CRPC, restored to service appellant. He later filed a petition in which he requested that the money recovered from him be returned to him and to announce the occurrence of the intervention. It was spent on duty saying that the application was rejected, the appellant filed an appeal The appellant's claim was that he had received a disputed amount of money with due diligence and with every power and that he was from the competent court. The offender was acquitted of the court and deported by the service tribunal and reinstated from the job, entitled to a recovered amount, his position was never claimed by the appellant himself and he was Denied the fact of making such payment and appellant after being acquitted of a criminal case and restored from employment, U-turn and took the money they had claimed its position, while the civil servant before the appellant had refused, tried to blow hot and cold at the same time immigration advocate from FR DI Khan lawyer