Find a Lawyer

DR. ABDUL LATEEF versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, LYARI GENERAL HOSPITAL

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (iii) and 5 of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973), after the removal of the service appellant appellant from the position of Section 4 Medical Officer, he was notified of the charge. He was removed from the job after being released. She was unofficially absent from duty without prior notice and permission. Appellant requested that her mother be critically ill and engaged in providing medical treatment. In support of her request, she requested medical prescriptions. , Medical test reports, ECG holiday copies applied. Neither the appellant was denied nor denied by the authority record, it does not appear that before issuing the showcase notice, the appellant had to require restoration of his duties that the department had It is mandatory that the appellant's mother inquire about the fact or cause of her illness. In doing so, the applicant was presented after the show cause notice and then after the final showcase notice the applicant was terminated from the service, there would be no legal injunction in the eyes of the law in all proceedings. , Whether the judicial or administrative principles of natural justice had to be adhered to nor the procedure laid down nor the order of abolition of adherence to the principles of natural justice kept aside from service. And the appellant was instructed to reinstate advocate for immigration from Kamalia lawyer