SHAHZAD HASSAN BHATTI versus PLATINUM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER
Section 5 and 12 (2) 2/2 year appeal delays, implant verdicts / injunctions were approved in 7 2 2002, appellant applied for his certified copies on 14 2 2002, which was 21 2 2002. Were prepared and handed over. Appeal was filed on 9-10 2004 in 27 9 2004. Such copies were attempted to be excluded in the calculation of the time limit used till the date of delivery No document was kept on record In order to show that the copying agency did not, in fact, give any copies to the original date appellant was not included with the receipt of the appeal issued by the copying agency at the time of receipt of the civil form. , Which was the only first evidence to indicate whether an actual date was given or not, the filing deadline appeals, Such copies will not be calculated from the date of delivery / submission. Appellant will not be able to exclude the time spent during preparation of copies unless his High Court has declared his appeal invalid over time. Prohibited
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer