Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN WAPDA versus RIAZ MUHAMMAD

Article 54 A Special Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 provisional injunction prohibited, the trial court's grant granted a temporary injunction to the consumer, which prevented the authorities from disconnecting the consumer's electricity connection Specific amount should be deposited within. During the 30-day period in the appellate court, the appellate court found that the submission of the specific amount was strict and the trial court's order denied the provisional injunction and that the appellate court ruled that the condition of the deposit was excluded. Doing justice will be in the interest of justice. In order to provide consumers with a guaranteed bond of equal amount, the authorities issued an appellate court replacement order stating that the order was unusual in section 54A of the Electricity Act, 1910 And the breach under which the order was not replaced with a guaranteed guarantee. Bail is much more than a cash deposit or a bank guarantee, discounting the client against the claimant bill, can ease the issue and can also cause financial trouble to the legal entity, none of the circumstances in the interim. Somehow, the courts had to prepare dynamically. The parties were held in a position of equal benefit and loss, which was intended by the Justice High Court to amend the civil court order to the extent that the consumer had a trial court 1 / 3rd, using its review jurisdiction. Submit the amount of The bill has been claimed and the bank will provide a guaranteed six-week period for another 2/3, failing which the order will be vacated. famous supreme court advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer