Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE

Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 109 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Complaint of the Complainant's FIR Case was that apart from forgery of the sale contract, the applicant knowingly made it He was also threatened to kill under which this crime was committed. Section 6506, PPC, which was an admissible offense, the applicant's request was that if all of the prosecution's allegations were true, the applicant's action only occurred under Article 4 464, the first clause of the PPC , Whose offense was punishable under Section 8 468, PPC, and admissible. The prosecution further claimed that the FIR could not be registered in unlawful crimes and that such cases could not be investigated without the prior permission of the magistrate and even before the arrest warrant was obtained. Can't be done, there was no charge on the record. Against the petitioner that he has, in any case, illegally expelled the complainant or the seller of the property / property in any dispute if for any person, Section 420, pp. While no property was appealed to the facts of the case for the CK Prima Fee application, the applicant was not accused of forcibly declaring any documents intended to be valuable security. Holds or according to its preamble fax application section 676767, PPC was also not attracted to the petitioner The allegation against Nida was that he signed a contract to sell the property owner's signature in a controversial applicant act. property advocate from Khangarh lawyer