Find a Lawyer

MIAN ZIA-UD-DIN versus SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT

RR 10A, 10B & 22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Writing of Coco Warrant, petitioner's issuance sought a directive against the respondents in the nature of a Quito Warrant by the Secretary as a Grade 17 Officer. Was appointed as a Town Officer, who was a Provincial Government Officer in Grade B Section 19, claiming no relief for himself, but he alleged that the appointment of a defendant to the post of BS-19 The Secretary's controversial order was arbitrary and politically motivated by the Secretary's claim. The disputed order was temporary and made in the public interest. On the basis of the temporary charge, the appointment was considered in the R10A of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974, under which the senior officer was entitled to be appointed. The department is allotted for development and on the recommendation of the department publicity committee or the provincial selection board and on the basis of the existing charge under R10B, the rules will also be appointed on the basis of seniority and the senior most public servant. The Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) under R22 of the 1974 Act shall also be entitled to make ad hoc appointments. The newspaper needed to advertise the vacancy, in the circumstances, not only was the rule hypocritical, but also disobedient. The impeachment order was declared without legal authority, saying it was vacant to fill that position. Will go In accordance with applicable law and service rules Pakistan, top advocate family court from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer