MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus SESSIONS JUDGE, PAKPATTAN
Section 22A (6) and 154 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 212 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitutional application for the filing of an FIR against the applicant under the PFC Section 212, PPC Submitted to the trial court under Following the investigation, the defendant filed an order, after receiving the required report from the District Police Officer, to cancel the FIR against the persons involved in the trial session judge and register the case. To which Section H has been directed to present the offense. Regarding litigation against the applicant / complainant was a petition filed under clause 22A (6) against the applicant, several before the CCP challan was submitted under section 22A. Was produced in a trial court months ago. ()) Before the CCC Judge invites, the CCP can be tried in a criminal case by the defendant and the relevant FIR may be filed by a magistrate or any other court or executive officer before the trial court. After submitting the invoice and hearing of the case, the trial court cannot be canceled after the trial court has taken cognizance of the case. The judge regarding the cancellation of the FIR cannot be allowed to act as a Sessions Judge after an inquiry into this matter. Justice of the Peace of Justice of Peace. Respondent's second prayer for conducting an inquiry may not be allowed. As Chief Justice of Justice for Peace because this was a matter which the Sessions Judge already had in the Department
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jhal Magsi lawyer