The proceedings against the accused involved in Section 514 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324 and 34 of the Guaranteed Guarantee Act were dealt with under Sections 324 and 34, with bail for the PPC and the applicant accused. Interim bail was set for pre-arrest bail. Each of the bail bonds, worth Rs 50,000, failed to appear in the bail application in court, was dismissed for illegal prosecution, and bail bonds issued by the applicants / guarantees. Was ordered to seize the applicants requested that the guarantees presented by them were for the next only and not for any other default in the date of hearing and for which the applicant paid the bail amount. Applicants' dispute was canceled because after issuing bail bonds, the lawsuit All dates until the final disposal was accused took the initiative to present in court. Applicants were responsible for the absence of the accused on the dates found in the Bail Trial Court after the date of bail and appear to have reduced the amount of bail from Rs. 15, amounter each is made, no further deduction can be allowed as requested by the applicant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
