PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL STORAGE AND SERVICES CORPORATION LIMITED (PASSCO) THROUGH MANAGER (ADORN.) ATT versus QAMAR-UL-ISLAM
A. VIII, Plaintiff's R11, Plaintiff's refusal to accept all aspects of the trial court is considered to be only two paragraphs of the case and is rejected under Oh VI, R 11, CPC. The trial court moved the contents of the case referred to in the second paragraph by the trial court during the trial to decide the dispute by the trial court, deciding the application under OVII, R 11, CPC. Without a judicial mind was not enforced. Following the application of the Judicial Mine Order by the trial court, the parties were not in compliance with the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1908, and the law passed by the Superior Court, the order passed by the trial court, was set aside and the case remanded. Was. Appeal allowed in trial court to decide case after case formulation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Quaidabad lawyer