Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

CHAIRMAN, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN


Sections 4 (1) and 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Bid of Constitutional Request, Disqualification of the Chairman Ivy Trust Property Board for overcharge, under constitutional request, Federal Government Property Order , Auctioned. The Evacuee Trust Property Board and the defendant were the highest bidder auction committee that approved the auction, but the chairman did not confirm the auction on the basis that the board was federal under its jurisdiction under section 17 of the Avivyke Trust Properties (Management). Wants to bring more value to the government. The Endowment and Disposal Act, 1975, rejected the order passed by the Chairman and affirmed the auction in favor of the respondents, which showed the federal government's increased legal status through the Evaci Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act 1975. Was. In the Legislature, the Government recognized by the provisions of the Evaci Trust Property Relations (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975, that if the disposal of trust property was to be made, the proper purpose of a fair and good price board should be. There was a well-known open public auction for the property settlement, which was the procedure adopted in the present case and the respondent was the highest bidder. The Evacuee Trust Property Board could not identify any illegal or unlawful proceedings in the auction proceedings, keeping the auction right after the facts and circumstances of the case were taken into consideration. There was no illegal or unlawful jurisdiction in the proceedings and there was no guarantee of interference by the High Court. After the federal government's decision, the equity bank bore

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Matli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.