Find a Lawyer

TARIQ ZAFAR versus STATE

Sections 561A and 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 114/161/212/223/224/225/342/344/345/353 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 Anti-Terrorism Act ( XXVII of 1997), Section 7A Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 115B proceedings abolished by two constables and Section I stated that the three accused escaped due to negligence, sedition and cowardice of the accused. The station's Department HOO expressed the concerned police officers. He had only formed an opinion and was told that no material was brought to the record to justify the speculation, suggesting that no material was available to suggest that the accused was in any way guilty. An indictment of the prosecution has been proven to have been illegal or has actively assisted the perpetrators to escape their escape. In this case, even if accepted, it would only appear that the accused was simply negligent in performing his duties which demonstrated his interference with the criminals affecting their escape and neglect. Did not There will be no criminal liability in the performance of the duty and will be eligible for action under the highest qualification and discipline rules for which he was unlawfully arrested and involved. The counterclaim was canceled and the accused was soon released. immigration advocates contact from Musafir Khana lawyer