Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Article 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The infringement of constitutional jurisdiction of the Court of Fundamental Rights directed the applicants that their license would not be revoked, but no program of the applicant-specific radio channel was broadcast again. Will do The applicant company has continued to re-broadcast the said program on different dates, though the applicants have apologized unqualifiedly, stating that it was not intentional, but they alleged that the petitioner's original Rights have been violated that have banned the broadcast of radio channels. The fundamental rights of the applicants were violated, it was not yet determined that the conduct of the applicants will be heard in the discretionary jurisdiction of the High Court to prevent them. The constitutional application was dismissed. And in view of the applicant's unforgivable apology, they were not prosecuted in contempt of court. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Abbaspur lawyer