Find a Lawyer

BASHIR HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD TUFAIL

Section 44 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), amendments to Sections 96 and 115, are subject to the different circumstances in which the Revenue Record Plaintiff claimed to have acquired the land as a tenant on the basis of the Khasra Garwadi entries. The deputy commissioner, who had already been allotted by the High Forum, owned the suit land provincial government and the physical possession of the plaintiff was an unlawful decision and a decree passed by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff was obtained. As a result, the plaintiff's claim of failure to identify any evidence that was read and misread by the appellate court was not submitted by the plaintiff regarding the title of the land, therefore, Court refuses to intervene Appeal court finds facts allowed by appellate court There was nothing weak and illegal in the judgment. According to the law, it was approved only after the re-evaluation of the evidence on the record. patent advocate from Risalpur lawyer