Find a Lawyer

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER versus ZAHID SHARIF

Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) allegations of termination of employment after a government employee was acquitted of a criminal case, a regular inquiry was initiated and proceedings towards the impugned authority. After the summary process, the penalties were set aside by the Executive Engineer in the appeal of a competent authority service tribunal rather than a standalone engineer, and government employees were reinstated with the benefits of withdrawing from employment. Serious allegations of corruption were leveled against a civil servant. The commencement of the disciplinary proceedings was followed by the necessary rituals prescribed under the Code and the dismissal order was approved after giving the civil servant a reasonable opportunity of hearing, it seems that the dismissal order was made by the Executive Engineer for any false impression. Approved or inadvertently exempt and on the basis of which all rules governed by the Proceedings cannot be declared void and in view of the summary procedure for distributing inquiry and directing the competent authority, no new The inquiry cannot be carried out because of serious prejudice to the public servant. One of the beneficial places to fill in the blanks, if any, should be given to civil servants. The Supreme Court accepted the appeal and, after receiving the remand of any investigative matter, dismissed the unwanted decision, so that the matter could be decided on the basis of the evidence available without any investigation. advocates from Jamrud Road lawyer