YARA versus STATE
Section 2 30b (b) review of the allegations proved on the record to be firmly in the record that he opened indiscriminate firing which resulted in the death of the deceased woman, which the eyewitnesses clearly stated The victim was reported to have sustained a gunshot wound to her head while she was peeping. The draftsman's testimony from the window, which confessed that there was no eyewitness testimony, cannot be superseded by the ocular version presented by natural eye witnesses, not even a question to the draftsman about the presence and location of eyewitnesses. Told. The evidence is similar to the eyewitness accounts. The special request made by the accused in which the victim was dismissed by the prosecution witness was not made a status or an FIR was registered, nor was any evidence of the accused in the case. Was entered by At the home of the incident, no interference was sought for the harmonious results of the two courts below accordingly omitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Jandanwala lawyer