Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus SAMINA MASOOD

Under Article 199 of the Constitution, Article 19 of the High Court and Article 199 of the Constitution under the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 25 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973) were resumed, Pakistan International Airlines Corporation. Called Regulation 25 to challenge proposals Under the Employees (Service and Discipline) Regulations, 1985, an air host was to be retired from time to time to increase the age of thirty-five. While his other colleagues were retiring at the age of sixty-five in Groups I to IV, such a difference in retirement age had already been challenged by several airlines before Karachi as well as the High Court. The difference is discrimination. The sex-based, gross violation of Article 25 (2) was brought by airlines in the dispute over the constitution raised by the airlines, mainly related to the terms and conditions of service. And that's why Section 2A, the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, treats Air Hosts before the Federal Service Tribunal and at the time of filing a constitutional petition by the High Court, no order was issued, whether Air Submitted by the Departmental Authority. Hosts were in the field under the consideration of Section 5, Service Tribunals Act 1973, therefore, to be challenged before the Retired Service Tribunal Edge determined by Regl. n 25 was a term and condition but the department did not violate it. If the department did so, the airports had the right to challenge it before the service tribunal, an order passed by the departmental authority. power of attorney advocate Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer