MANAGING DIRECTOR, OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. versus SYED NAJMUL HASSAN NAQVI
Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VII, R11 Premature Appeal Filing an appeal before the expiration of the ninth day was mandatory Retirement sentence, a public servant must be set aside, but the service tribunal allowed the appeal And set it apart. The penalty imposed by the officials was that the public servant filed an appeal the same day after filing a department representation, thus the appeal was premature, dismissed by the correctness of the service tribunal, In the initial phase, serious wrongdoing, the timely withdrawal of the appeal was avoided and the cause of action pending the timely appeal of the appeal was sustained and the appeal was dismissed on the ground that the initial offer was premature. If such a face service was taken by the tribunal. Under the no-justice deal, it could not be verified that matters were not premature but rather premature and had to be reversed, resulting in the suspension of the tribunal and the civil servants. The appeal was needed to retract the broad claims of. In the first case, if this was not followed, the Tribunal could not subsequently harm the civil servant on the basis of premature appeal when the service tribunal allowed the seminary to be allowed by the service tribunal. It was during this time. Appeal dismissed for premature score dismissal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Khanqah Sharif lawyer