Section 304 I Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) After the clash with the other party, the accused party returned to his house and returned armed with deadly weapons and in retaliation proceedings with the victim injured. Witnesses were also harmed. The ocular version presented by the injured witnesses was entirely proved by medical evidence that the victim was charged with a fatal injury that prompted him to act in self-defense at the time of the incident. The defense failed to prove that neither the defendant's pleadings were correct nor convincing since neither the defendant had filed any counter-lawsuit nor the witnesses had made such plea during their investigation. ? The accused had confessed to his presence at the site of the incident at the relevant time and he could not be excused from the responsibility. The commission of the search of the crimes filed by the two courts below did not guarantee any interference against the accused being careful and reasonable. Appellant's leave to appeal by nce denied the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
