A. XXIII, R 3 Suit Scope Regular Summary of the Inquiry Decision Defendants filed an affidavit in which they presented the agreement between the parties and prayed for the same decision based on the terms of the agreement. And, alternatively, additional evidence of prayer was denied by defendants and plaintiff applicants for the right to be executed, another application for the comparison of signatures and thumbprints was moved, and by another application, The agreement was reached between the parties before the `jirga '. The defendant was asked to submit for his admission and in addition to such petitions, another application under Article 631 of the Law Martyrs, 1984, was also moved for the decision of the Special Oath Was that while the requests were simultaneously rejected at the time of the reporting of the settlement, the matter was brought before the court in any matter between the parties, so the result was the court's decision regarding the execution and the presence of the agreement itself. To satisfy and when this question arises whether there is a compromise between the parties, take the evidence and After a formal investigation into trd had to decide. The summary of such request was not appropriate and the refusal to enter such an inquiry would in fact be contrary to the letter and spirit of the provisions contained in OI XXII, R 3, CPC under the said law, Recording a compromise was not a formal process but essentially, according to the ROLLI, the R1 (M) CPC courts did not exercise the jurisdiction they had exercised, and
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
