In Sections 302 (b) and 392 the morning of the trial, the definition of evidence was highly unlikely because they did not inform the police, the complainant or anyone else on the day of the incident, nor did they make statements on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses. The deceased had attended Reliance's funeral, recovery was not safe under the circumstances. The pistols were unnecessary at the request of the 30 bore suspects as two pistols were seized, but they were not sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory. The only effect of the report was that the pistol was in the working order, the FIR did not mention that the deceased was carrying a currency with him when he left home. The trial court that the co-accused had extracted currency from the victim's shalwar's pocket was not conducive to prosecution in cash recovery situations. The prosecutor's case was that the victim was riding a motorcycle at the time of his murder and stated that the motorcycle was also the accused. The prosecution case was not lost and recovered as a matter of doubt, the accused was entitled to the benefit of the doubt, not a matter of grace, but the appeal of the accused was allowed as part of the case. And the conviction imposed by the trial court was set aside and given them the benefit of the doubt. Charging was acquitted of the charges, and he was imprisoned. ased
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
