DR. ZAHRA HASSAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY HEALTH
The constitutional plea of the Arts 25 and 1991 to the death of the senior demonstrator, the refusal of the financial worker to the widow of a deceased government employee in pursuance of Letter No. FD of the Treasury Department of the Medical College's Department of Pharmacy, Article 10 11 The request of the Department of 2004 was that the applicant's husband had died before the issuance of the said notification, thus he was not entitled to take advantage of it, to provide umbrella cover to all the families of the government. Notification was issued. Employees whose service has expired, such notification will be applicable as soon as it is found to be beneficial. Records show that the government also benefited from this notification to another doctor's widow, who died in accordance with Article 25 of the Constitution. Equality shall be entitled to equal protection of the law, not the duty of public servants or departments, nor to fail the grant of their rights to the people. Under such notification, the approval of the Chief Minister was not necessary for the grant of benefits. The same was the case with the other doctor's widow, so the Department's refusal to give similar benefits was violated Article 25 of the Constitution High Court set aside the post-order and directed the Department to apply. Pay financial benefits after such notification within a specified time of \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
