Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MAJEED versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT

Article 14 and 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Interim Restitution Allowance Interlocutory Order The final order had no effect on such an order, which was finally approved by the Family Court after assessing its ability to record and pay evidence. Read. Father / Husband cannot be subjected to judicial scrutiny in proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution unless an order gives the characteristics and effect of the final order.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ASHFAQ v. State 2013 YLR 1825
• Dr. ZAHRA HASSAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Health 2013 MLD 1835
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. SENIOR SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-CORRUPTION, LAHORE 2013 PCrLJ 1835
• WALI MUHAMMAD v. JAVED MUKHTIAR 2013 CLC 1837
• TANVEER AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 1845
• FARMAN ALI alias BHOLI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1847
• Ch. ZAHID IQBAL v. RETURNING OFFICER NA-162 (Sahiwal--III) 2013 CLC 1856
• GUL SHER v. DOST MUHAMMAD 2013 YLR 1856

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

top civil advocates from Chawinda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes