CH. ZAHID IQBAL versus RETURNING OFFICER NA-162 (SAHIWAL--III)
Disqualified for membership of Article 99 (1A) (h) and 14 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898) Sections 426 and 430 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 63 (1) (h) and 1991 Constitution of the Majlis Shura (Parliament) And punishment, running a discriminatory sentence simultaneously for the purpose of Article 63 (1) (h) of the Constitution, the suspension of punishment did not mean that the applicant had been given an involuntary injunction by the Returning Officer. Under which his papers were rejected nomination because he was sentenced. And sentenced to more than two years in total. The petitioner stated that the trial court's decision in accordance with Section 303030 CCPC was not final until its pending appeal was decided and therefore the adverse effects of the sentence could not be revealed. One of the accused, whose appeal is pending, especially where the sentence was also suspended, petitioner further claimed that he was sentenced to thirteen months in total. His convictions were to run concurrently. On each count Waldetti Petitioner was sentenced to thirteen months in prison, and the cumulative effect of all three different sentences was that he was sentenced to a total period of thirty-one (39) months, although the benefit of running this sentence was simultaneous application. The petitioner was approved, this does not mean that he was not sentenced for a period of nine months. The purpose of coordinating a sentence was to calculate the actual time period for which the offender would be jailed. His appeal could not succeed, however, and it did not have any effect on the sentence imposed by the trial court on each count under Article 63 (1) (h) of the Constitution. Public Representation Act, 1976 d
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
