The allegations against the applicants, accused in sections 200, 249A and 561A of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), sections 452, 506, 500, 379 and 427, were that they entered the shop and damaged the articles there. Abuse of the complainant's mother and theft of some articles from the shop, possession of the shop, warrants were issued and possession of the said shop was handed over to them by the court bailiff as well as the local police were charged by the applicants under section 249. A, moved a petition under CRPC which was dropped by the trial court's verification number. The details of any article that was harmed in this incident were described in the private complaint and even in the statements of the witnesses. The person cannot be expected to harm the articles and his theft was attributed to false facts. And continuing to do so equates to abuse of law and waste of court time. The circumstances of the trial did not condone his conviction as a crime, and the order passed by the trial court on the request of the accused applicants filed under Section 249 of the trial. A CRPC was set aside and ordered to cease and desist from the complaint.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
