Arts 63 (1) (n) and 199 Representatives Public Act (LXXXV of 1976), Section 14 Financial Institutions (Restoration of Financing) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Section 8 State Bank of Pakistan BPD Circular No. 29 Section 15 10 10 Disqualification for membership of the Constitution Parliament of 2002 (Majlis-e-Shurai) Act According to the law, the selection of a legally written debt bank was rejected by the Election Tribunal on the basis that the nomination papers of the candidates were rejected. His company received a loan written on the candidate's yellow. That he was the only shareholder in the company at 30% of the total shareholding, and had no control over the company. This loan was partially written in writing on a petition transferred by the company under BPD Circular No. 29/2002 of the State Bank of Pakistan, so it was a legitimate practice to cancel the loan in writing. It was approved by law that a commission was formed. Identifying and investigating cases by the Supreme Court where lending was made under illegal political considerations or political pressure. That all loans written by any circular, including BPD Circular No. 29/2002, were examined by the Commission, so under Article 63 (1) (n) of the Constitution, the candidate could participate in the selection of the candidate. Has been disabled. Under Article (63 (?) n) of the Constitution, it cannot be said that the company was not more than 30% of the total shareholding, and had no controlling interest in the company. Did not own or control the company, so, due to this money pending the company commission
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
