MUHAMMAD KHALID JAVAID versus STATE
The complaining party for the appreciation of section 302 (c) / 34 evidence received only five injuries while the accused party suffered sixteen injuries, some of them in the hands. On the very day of the incident, the accused was examined and the injuries inflicted on the accused persons were suppressed in the FIR, and before the trial court, there was no relief for the parties who had illegally returned to the court. Was not entitled. The complainant was outraged by the party and the number of seats and the number of seats on his person clearly showed that he acted in favor of his defense and was not exceeded. He was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Chaman lawyer
