SHER MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, LODHRAN
Section 42 of the Limitation Act (IX of 8, 19088), the suit of limitation for the declaration to the Su Su in which it was held that the execution of the sale by the Attorney General is void and upon the rights of the plaintiffs' inheritance. There was instability when a valid registered sale contract was inappropriate by timely decisions. Article 4 5 In 1964 one of the defendants obtained a certified copy in 1965, yet did not file a case for inaction, silence and negligence for a long period of 14 years until 1998; clear documentary evidence was that the defendants Was brought to the knowledge suit. At 14 years, five months and 21 days after the receipt of the reasons for the proceedings, the harmony shows that the case was unable to be sustained and that the review was excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Taxila lawyer
