Find a Lawyer

SYED AMJAD ALI SHAH versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

RR 6 02 & 6 03 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25, 199 and 212 Constitutional Application Citizens' Equal Appointment If filling in any vacancies, including contract employment, employees of Pakistan Television, eligible persons No appointment is permitted under the Pakistan Television Corporation Limited Employees Service Rules 1978 R6 02 of 1978 and under the Selection Board the appointment of a contract without any appointment of the above rules. Providing other PTV eligible employees with the opportunity to compete for a position of denial of equal opportunity in the case of public employment would violate Article 25 of the Constitution and may not apply for rehabilitation, In the present case there was only one candidate for this post. Program producers and they were not enforcing their terms of service and Article 1212 of the Constitution did not apply in the case of pets iTuner states that since the appointment was not made on a regular basis, proper procedures were followed. It was not necessary to be a pariah, it was not the fact that PTV was a trade organization and he was free to appoint a contract, violating its laws. Through the Supreme Court, only Project King could not make a false doctrine that could not be accepted in a society governed by a written constitution. The appointment of the respondents was violated, without breaching the rules and taking over the legal authority and position. It will be considered vacant and if the authorities have taken care to fill the vacancies, the procedure laid down in the service rules will be followed. criminal advocate from Sarai Alamgir lawyer