MALIK JAHANGIR AHMAD versus JUDGE SPECIAL COURT NO. 1, ANTI-TERRORISM, RAWALPINDI
Sections 302 (b), 324 and 398 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 345 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition were also found guilty under Section 7. Was. The Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, resulted in the death of prosecution witnesses and the prosecution witnesses for causing terror, fear and feeling insecurity in the public through a trial court. This decision is then upheld until the Supreme Court's reasoning. The main offense under section 2302 was the PPC compound; the offense under section 2 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 would also be considered compoundable, it had no power as the latter offense was more serious than crime against the society. And was kind of tough. Section 345, CRPC considered complex crimes and offenses under section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, was not included. ) Under Section 5, Cr, the CCP created a specific bar to promote crime that was not mentioned. The Anti-Terrorism Court dismissed the application for permission to arrest the accused for being illegal and arbitrary, which cannot be interfered with. High Court's constitutional jurisdiction constitutional petition was excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer