MEPCO THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus ADVISORY BOARD, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 26 (6), 38 (3) and 39 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Detection Bill The user challenged the detection bill and requested that there be no holes in the meter as to the allegations of surveillance. The team, allegedly, was not reported and was not affiliated with the meter inspection, which was installed outside the premises of the user's electric inspector, instructing the parties to consult the appropriate forum because 90 days. After passing its jurisdiction, the user filed an appeal before the Advisory Board, which accepted the user's version and enforced the tracking bill. Was issued because no theft was obtained by the approval of the Advisory Board, whether the meter was true or false, which could be referred to the matter when applying. Any party, the electric inspector, who has to make a decision within a period of 90 days, has to send the matter to the provincial government on the failure, which has to be decided by the FATA. The Nil Provincial Government was empowered under section 38 (3) of the Electricity Act, 1910 to assign the appellate authority's authority to entertain, hear and appeal a decision against the decision of the Advisory Board, without any jurisdiction. Submission was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
