Find a Lawyer

DIL AGHA versus STATE

Section 5 has been fully supported in the testimony of testimony testimony, reduction of positive report from hand grenade expert and the recovery of evidence of both witnesses of a pistol and prosecutor allegedly recovered from the accused who stated that the weapon It has been fully proved that hand grenades and pistols were found. At a given date, time and place, the defendant recovered, saying that the prosecution's witnesses were sufficient to link the accused to the commission of the crime The defense could not explain why the police would falsely include the suspect, especially When there was no enmity with any of the police party. Prosecuting witnesses against them, who were policemen, made regular statements on material points and the accused failed to identify any contradiction in their statements. The contradictions stated by the accused were so minor that they could not be charged because they were being prosecuted. The accused, who was standing, did not insist on any kind of rivalry or enmity against Po. Police officers / prosecution witnesses could not be considered in such cases with the accused, police witnesses were not reliable police. The witnesses are competent witnesses in the eyes of the law unless it can be proven that there is a motive or reason for the police to engage in false accusations. The statements of police officers cannot be ruled out simply because they were associated with the employees of the police department. It was alleged that she could not identify a serious defect in the investigation, except, in addition to some minor defects, that would lead to any kind of unlawful interference and jobs for fresh advocates from Minchanabad lawyer