Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/342/34 bail, was filed the next day of the incident and the complainant did not claim to have seen the accused and the accomplices firing, resulting in the subpoena. Had died, but the fact that the accused and the accomplices were directly charged in the FIR, in the case of medical evidence and the opportunity to recover the fine, is there in the record. In the first question, the accused and their accomplices participated in the crime. Highlighting the merits of the case, no case was filed for grant of bail and the petition for grant of bail was dismissed by the accused and the decisions cited by the accused were distinguished and they varied. Discussed the situation in which a referenced case was not necessarily applicable. The second issue of bail is to decide each case based on its own specific facts and circumstances. criminal advocate from Chawinda lawyer