Find a Lawyer

MASHAL KHAN versus STATE

To prove the facts of the arrest of the accused and recovery of heroin from the possession of the Arts 3/4 testimony, two police officers were presented. Both said the witnesses agreed in all major aspects of the case. And the accused cannot be identified in any way. The evidence of the prosecution was highly convincing in their statements to the detriment of the prosecution and the witnesses had no enmity or motive or intention to falsely implicate the defendant's presence, They were consistent about location and recovery at that time. Both the witnesses' question and the manner in which they were affected were subjected to lengthy and King's exams, but nothing could be done to help them, so that there was no delay in sending the recovered material to the Office of the Chemical Examiner. Can be made, especially when no objection was raised by the accused submissions in connection with the tampering or manipulation of Section 103, the provisions of the CRPC were not complied with in this case as no two in the area Respected persons were not affiliated with it, they had no prior power because under Section 103, Section 25 of the CRPC Narcotic substances were excluded under the control of substances. 1997 and the second reason was that the provisions of Section 20 of the said Act were in nature and their non-compliance could not be considered as a strong basis that the trial against the accused was bad due to a poor conclusion and the reasons. Which have been presented by the trial court. , Had shown a fair assessment of the evidence that determined the guilty jurisdiction law firms from Domeli lawyer