Find a Lawyer

NASIB-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Sections 514 and 516 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Surrender of Unlawful Arms Act (XXI of 1991), section 7 bail were charged with forfeiture of which appellants stood on bail, in court. After not appearing, the appellant / bail was burdened. On the failure to deposit Rs 40,000 each and submission, he said he was sentenced to a period of 6 months, guarantees legal liability for his payment under the bail bonds offered by him. Are not guaranteed, after assuming their responsibility. Their mouths say that because of their financial condition, they cannot pay the bonds executed by them and have stood up to them for charity and without any financial gain. , But there was no legal restriction that the full amount of the guarantee could not be confiscated. Where an accused has jumped into a bail bond, the entire amount of bail will be liable for confiscation by which the trial court has already reduced the amount of bail bonds to Rs 40,000. There was no reason, therefore, to reduce the amount of bail guarantees that were available to reduce the bail, the bail will be deemed accurate, reasonable and legal, for the intervention of the High Court in the jurisdiction of the appeal. n property advocates from Pasni lawyer